Exploring the Dynamics of ATOM Staking: Native vs. CEX

Published on:

  • Cosmos (ATOM) stands as a prominent player in the cryptocurrency space, celebrated for its lucrative staking rewards.
  • Native staking represents the process of staking ATOM directly on the Cosmos blockchain.
  • Yields from CEX staking consistently lag behind those attainable through native staking.

Cosmos (ATOM) stands as a prominent player in the cryptocurrency space, celebrated for its lucrative staking rewards. Yet, two distinct avenues exist to stake ATOM, each with unique merits and demerits. This comprehensive exploration delves into the world of native staking and centralized exchange (CEX) staking, meticulously dissecting each method’s varying yields, airdrop possibilities, and security implications.

Native Staking:

Native staking represents the process of staking ATOM directly on the Cosmos blockchain. It involves the utilization of various wallets, such as Keplr, Cosmostation, and Ledger Live, enabling users to participate in the network’s consensus mechanism actively.

One of the most compelling advantages native staking offers is the promise of superior yields. Presently, the annual percentage rate (APR) for native staking hovers around an enticing 18%, significantly outpacing the returns achievable through CEX staking alternatives.

Beyond the allure of high yields, native staking opens the door to potential airdrops. Airdrops, the distribution of complimentary tokens to ATOM holders, often exclude CEX users from participation. Consequently, should one harbor aspirations of benefiting from these free tokens, native staking is the requisite path.

Security further augments the appeal of native staking. When entrusting your ATOM to a CEX, you necessarily place faith in the exchange’s safeguarding of your assets. Regrettably, history is riddled with exchanges falling prey to hacking or bankruptcy, leading to substantial user losses. In contrast, native stakers maintain full control over their assets, as they are custodians of the private keys tethered to their ATOM holdings, significantly mitigating security concerns.

CEX Staking:

CEX staking, on the other hand, presents a more accessible alternative for ATOM holders. This approach entails a straightforward process: deposit your ATOM into a centralized exchange and commence reaping the rewards. The setup lacks complexities typically associated with native staking, making it an attractive option for those disinclined to delve into the intricacies of blockchain technology.

However, the allure of convenience comes at a cost. Yields from CEX staking consistently lag behind those attainable through native staking. The APR for staking ATOM on Coinbase, for example, hovers around 10%, noticeably trailing the enticing 18% offered by native staking.

Furthermore, CEX stakers must reckon that they are precluded from airdrops. As elucidated earlier, these airdrop opportunities tend to favor native stakers, thus relinquishing this potential source of added value.

The question then arises: which path to ATOM staking should one choose? The answer is inherently subjective and hinges on individual needs and preferences. If your primary objectives encompass maximizing yields and actively participating in airdrops, native staking emerges as the superior option. Conversely, for those who prioritize ease of use and convenience, CEX staking remains an appealing choice.

Ultimately, the onus falls squarely on your shoulders to conduct diligent research and select the staking method that aligns most seamlessly with your aspirations and risk tolerance. To guide you in your deliberations, here are some supplementary factors to contemplate:

1. Fee Structure: 

Assess the fees the exchange or wallet provider levied. Some entities impose fees for staking services, necessitating a thorough evaluation of their impact on your returns.

2. Security Protocols: 

Prioritize exchanges and wallet providers boasting impeccable track records in security. The preservation of your assets depends on the robustness of their security infrastructure.

3. User-Friendliness:

Evaluate the user-friendliness of the staking process. Does it necessitate a substantial technical insight, or can it be executed easily?

As you diligently consider these variables, you will be better equipped to make an informed choice regarding the optimal destination for your ATOM holdings. Whether investors lean toward native staking for its bountiful rewards and enhanced security or favor CEX staking for its simplicity, their decision should align seamlessly with their unique preferences and objectives in cryptocurrency staking.

Read: 

Related

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

JOSEPH KANGETHE
JOSEPH KANGETHE
I am a tech, business, and investment news reporter covering Africa. Most of what is good in Africa is obscured by preconceptions, yet there is still a lot of good going on. Technology is what is driving the continent and this is my passion. For Africa, I share the stories that are important to Africans.